Leadership is often tested in two very different situations: how we respond when people criticize us and how we respond when people need us. While reading Harold Myra and Marshall Shelley’s The Leadership Secrets of Billy Graham, these two areas stood out to me because they connect directly with what I am learning in my present leadership roles.
Billy Graham’s example reminds me that leadership is not simply about having influence. It is about developing the character necessary to handle that influence well.
Learning to Love Harsh Critics
One statement from the book especially challenged me:
“When criticism is a threat, a leader becomes defensive, but when it is viewed as a natural occurrence and a challenge, it can become a source of constructive energy.”
Criticism is unavoidable in leadership. The question is not whether people will criticize us, but what we will allow criticism to produce within us.
Throughout my ministerial journey, I have experienced criticism concerning my abilities, leadership, calling, and even character. I have learned that criticism does not have to determine my identity, but it can contribute to my development.
There have been people who did not believe I could go further in my calling. Instead of allowing those opinions to stop me, I have used them as motivation to pursue God more deeply and allow Him to have the final say concerning where He wants me to go.
Criticism concerning character requires an even different response. Rather than immediately becoming defensive, I have learned the importance of having conversations, listening to the concerns of others, and evaluating whether there are areas in my life that genuinely need improvement.
That does not mean every criticism is correct.
It means I want to be secure enough that criticism does not control me while remaining humble enough to learn when there is truth within it.
A growing leader should be able to take criticism seriously without taking every criticism personally.
Leading Through Love
Another lesson that resonated with me was Graham’s emphasis on leading through love. Myra and Shelley write:
“Sometimes love is shown by a thoughtful word, by willingness to help an employee in trouble or by refusal to retaliate when attacked; other times love is shown by simply showing up.”
This challenged me to think about leadership beyond positions, titles, and responsibilities.
Sometimes leadership is simply showing up.
In my current role working for a nonprofit youth organization, I have opportunities to mentor young people, but leadership also happens behind the scenes. I try to help with administrative responsibilities, complete smaller tasks that need attention, and assist my team when deadlines are approaching.
These actions may seem insignificant, but service can influence culture.
As I continued helping in these areas, my manager eventually began implementing rotations that encouraged other staff members to contribute in similar ways. What began as simply trying to help became an opportunity to influence how our team serves one another.
That experience reminded me that leadership culture is not shaped only through instructions. Sometimes culture is shaped through example.
Leadership Without Recognition
There is also an important distinction between serving others and using service as a way of gaining recognition.
Christian leadership cannot simply ask, What will make me look like a good leader?
Instead, we should ask, How can I genuinely help the people God has placed around me?
Jesus modeled leadership through service. Leadership rooted in love does not always need acknowledgment. Sometimes it means completing the unnoticed task, encouraging someone who is struggling, helping a coworker, mentoring a young person, or simply being present when someone needs support.
Our actions can communicate love before our leadership position ever does.
Becoming the Leader God Is Forming
These two lessons from Billy Graham complement each other.
Criticism develops something within the leader, while love expresses something through the leader.
Criticism can develop humility, self-awareness, perseverance, and maturity. Love then allows those qualities to become visible through service toward others.
I am continuing to learn that leadership development is not merely about becoming more influential. It is about becoming the kind of person who can steward influence faithfully.
I want to become a leader who can receive criticism without immediately becoming defensive, evaluate myself honestly, continue pursuing God’s calling despite opposition, and serve people without needing recognition.
Ultimately, leadership is not only about where we lead people.
It is also about who we are becoming while we lead them.
Worship is easy to associate with what happens inside the church. We sing, pray, hear Scripture, give, and gather with other believers. Yet biblical worship consistently challenges us to consider what happens after we leave the sanctuary.
Does our worship change how we treat people?
Does our relationship with God shape how we respond to injustice?
And when people are overwhelmed by sin and guilt, are we willing to stand in the gap and pray for them?
The books of Amos and Ezra approach these questions from different circumstances, but together they reveal something important: worship should move us toward both people and God. We act with compassion toward others while interceding before God on their behalf.
When Worship and Justice Become Separated
During the time of Amos, Israel continued practicing religious rituals while injustice and oppression remained present within society. Their problem was not simply that they had abandoned religious activity. In many ways, they were still religious.
The problem was the separation between their worship and their treatment of others.
R. Alan Fuhr describes how Israel practiced the ritual worship required by the Mosaic law while simultaneously participating in social oppression and societal neglect. Their outward worship continued, but something was deeply wrong with the life surrounding it.
Israel could not separate devotion to God from righteous treatment of others.
That same principle should challenge Christians today.
We often emphasize having a “personal relationship with God,” and that relationship is essential. We also recognize our relationship with the Body of Christ. But biblical worship pushes us beyond ourselves. If we worship a God who is righteous, compassionate, merciful, and just, those characteristics should increasingly shape how we interact with the people around us.
Our worship should have consequences outside the sanctuary.
More Than Choosing a Side
When injustice or oppression becomes visible, our first instinct can sometimes be to determine which “side” we are supposed to support.
But Christian faithfulness requires something deeper.
Our response cannot be reduced simply to voting, political affiliation, or participation in cultural arguments. Before asking which group we belong to, we should be asking what faithfulness to Christ requires of us.
Who is hurting?
Who is being overlooked?
Where is truth being ignored?
How can we love our neighbor while remaining faithful to God?
Speaking against oppression does not require abandoning truth, and speaking truth does not require abandoning love. Biblical worship should form believers who are capable of doing both.
If our lips declare the goodness of God on Sunday, our actions throughout the week should reflect the character of the God we worship.
When Guilt Builds Walls
Ezra introduces another dimension of worship: intercession.
After Israel survived exile, the people continued struggling with compromise and sin. Ezra felt the spiritual weight of what was happening among God’s people and responded through prayer.
Donna Petter makes an important observation about Ezra’s prayer: it calls upon God’s mercy to act.
There is an important tension here.
The people still needed to respond through repentance. Ezra’s prayer did not eliminate human responsibility. Yet Israel could not manufacture divine forgiveness for itself either. They needed the mercy and grace of God.
This has significant implications for pastoral ministry.
I have seen people become stuck in their faith because of their past. Even after change begins and forgiveness has been offered, guilt can remain.
The question becomes:
“Does God really love me even though I have sinned?”
When that question goes unanswered, guilt can slowly build walls.
When an Encounter Turns Into Guilt
I have seen a version of this in youth ministry.
A young person may come to church and genuinely encounter God. Then they disappear for several weeks. Eventually, the longer they stay away, the harder returning becomes.
What began as an encounter with God can become overshadowed by guilt.
They may think they have disappointed God. They may feel embarrassed about returning. They may convince themselves that they need to “get right” before coming back.
Those are moments when pastoral ministry requires more than asking, “Where have you been?”
Sometimes we need to stand in the gap.
Ezra reminds me of the importance of praying on behalf of the people God has entrusted to us. I have had opportunities to pray over young people and ask God to extend His mercy, restore their hearts, and help them experience the freedom they have in Christ.
Sometimes the person struggling to pray needs someone else praying for them.
That is part of the beauty of intercession.
Worship Moves in Two Directions
Amos and Ezra ultimately challenge me in complementary ways.
Amos pushes worship outward.
If I worship God, I should care about my neighbor. I should notice suffering, confront injustice with truth and love, and refuse to allow my Christianity to become merely ritualistic.
Ezra pushes worship upward.
When I see brokenness, sin, guilt, and spiritual struggle around me, I should bring those people before God. I cannot transform another person’s heart, but I can intercede for them and trust the mercy of God.
Together, these perspectives create a powerful picture of worship:
We move toward people in love, and we move toward God in prayer.
That challenges me personally because life does not become less busy as ministry responsibilities increase. If anything, busyness makes intentional intercession more difficult.
But perhaps that is exactly why it must become a discipline.
The more people God places around me, the greater my responsibility to remember that ministry is not only what I say to people. Ministry also includes what I say to God about them.
From Ritual to a Life of Worship
The challenge of Amos remains relevant: worship cannot become something we perform while ignoring the world around us.
The example of Ezra adds another dimension: when we encounter the brokenness of that world, our response should include intercession.
Biblical worship therefore refuses to remain confined to a service.
It enters our relationships.
It shapes our response to injustice.
It brings other people’s burdens into our prayers.
It calls us toward repentance.
And it continually brings us back to the mercy of God.
Perhaps one of the questions every worshiper should regularly ask is not simply, “Did I worship God today?”
Instead, we might ask:
“What is my worship producing in the way I love people, respond to brokenness, and pray for those God has placed around me?”
When worship begins transforming those areas of our lives, it moves beyond ritual and becomes a way of life.
Reflections on Eugene Peterson’s Follow the Leader series
What does it mean to be a successful Christian leader? Is success measured by the number of people attending our churches, the ministries we establish, the positions we hold, or the influence we develop? Or is there a deeper measurement that challenges our understanding of leadership altogether?
As I listened to Eugene Peterson’s Follow the Leader series, I found myself wrestling with these questions. Peterson examines the leadership of Jesus in its historical context, contrasting his approach with influential figures such as Herod, Caiaphas, and Josephus. Through these comparisons, he challenges the assumptions we often bring into Christian leadership, particularly our understanding of power, success, relationships, and personal ambition.
One of the greatest insights I gained from this series is that Jesus did not simply provide a model for becoming an effective leader. He invited us to become faithful followers.
This distinction challenges not only how I approach ministry but also how I understand my calling, my ambitions, and the importance of remaining faithful wherever God has placed me.
The challenge of following before leading
Early in the third part of his series, Peterson emphasizes a distinction that caught my attention: Jesus said, “Follow me,” not “lead like me.”
Peterson explains that following is often more difficult than leading because it requires greater attention and moral energy. This challenges the tendency to focus on developing leadership abilities without giving equal attention to our relationship with Jesus.
Leadership requires skills, knowledge, experience, and preparation. However, Christian leadership must begin with something deeper: a life of prayer, obedience, and dependence upon Christ.
Before I can lead others faithfully, I must examine whether I am faithfully following Jesus myself.
This insight brought me back to my experience as a new believer in high school. At the time, I had a strong desire to become a leader on my campus and establish a Christian club. My passion for ministry was present, but my preparation was still developing.
I wanted to lead, yet I lacked the biblical knowledge and training necessary for the responsibility I desired. I also had not fully recognized the importance of receiving guidance from the leaders God had placed in my life.
Nevertheless, that Christian club had value. We served our campus, built community, and sought to demonstrate what it meant to follow Jesus.
Looking back, I recognize that even though my preaching and teaching abilities were limited, following Jesus involved more than standing in front of people and delivering a message. It involved obedience, service, relationships, and learning to live according to his example.
That experience helped me recognize that our desire to lead must never become more important than our commitment to follow.
Prayer before personal ambition
One of the ways Peterson’s teaching challenges my current approach to leadership is by encouraging me to reflect on prayer more often than goal setting.
I enjoy establishing goals, developing plans, and pursuing opportunities. These activities have value, particularly when we are responsible for leading others. However, they also present an important spiritual question.
Am I submitting my plans to Jesus, or am I simply asking him to bless the direction I have already chosen?
Peterson emphasizes that prayer is essential to following Jesus. In the third part of his series, he discusses how prayer forms us into followers from the inside out.
This means that following Jesus is not merely about outward activities. We can participate in ministry, develop leadership abilities, and accomplish organizational goals while neglecting the spiritual formation necessary to sustain faithful discipleship.
Prayer invites us to examine our motives and surrender our direction to Christ.
As I continue developing as a minister, I want to become increasingly intentional about seeking God’s direction rather than relying exclusively on my abilities, expectations, or understanding of what should happen next.
The challenge is not to stop planning. It is to allow my plans to be influenced by Jesus.
When success becomes a distraction
Another aspect of Peterson’s teaching that challenged me was his discussion of success and failure.
Throughout his series, Peterson contrasts Jesus with influential leaders of the first century. Herod demonstrated considerable political and organizational influence, while Caiaphas exercised authority within the religious establishment.
Yet Jesus did not organize his ministry around the conventional measurements of success represented by these leaders.
In the second part of the series, Peterson explains that Jesus’ life can appear unsuccessful when evaluated according to society’s expectations. He also observes that faithful individuals can become invisible because their lives do not conform to what society values.
This challenges how we understand success within contemporary Christianity.
Our Christian communities exist in a culture shaped by music, entertainment, celebrity, social media, and numerical exposure. As individuals gain influence, they may experience increasing pressure to maintain their recognition and status.
The danger arises when preserving influence becomes more important than faithfully following Jesus.
This is especially challenging for me because I desire to serve in a pastoral ministry position in the future.
As an ordained minister currently serving without a pastoral staff position, I have wrestled with the relationship between my calling, my credentials, and the opportunities I hope to pursue.
At times, it can be tempting to view a position as validation of my ministerial identity. Yet Peterson’s teaching challenges me to examine whether I am pursuing opportunities primarily to serve others or to become somebody in the eyes of others.
A pastoral position can provide meaningful opportunities to lead, teach, disciple, and develop ministries. However, it should not determine the value of my present service or become the ultimate measurement of my faithfulness.
I am learning that being faithful where God has placed me matters just as much as preparing for wherever he may lead me next.
This gives me a desire to continue praying and trusting his direction, even when the outcome of my ministry pursuits remains unknown.
The difference between ambition and energy
One of the most helpful distinctions Peterson makes is between ambition and energy.
In the first part of his series, he discusses how ambition can become connected to personal importance, recognition, and achieving our own goals. He contrasts this with the energy, obedience, and discipline necessary for faithful service.
This distinction is particularly meaningful when pursuing leadership opportunities.
It is possible to work diligently, develop skills, establish goals, and pursue opportunities without allowing personal ambition to become the driving force behind our decisions.
The question is what motivates our pursuit.
Do I want to lead because I desire recognition, or because I see an opportunity to serve? Am I pursuing a particular position because it will make me feel successful, or because I believe I can faithfully contribute to the ministry God has entrusted to me?
These are questions I want to continue asking throughout my ministerial journey.
My desire is not to lose the energy and passion I have for ministry. Rather, I want those qualities to be shaped by prayer, obedience, and a willingness to follow Jesus wherever he leads.
A PERSONAL REFLECTION
The goal is not to abandon our passion for leadership, but to surrender the ambition that places ourselves at the center of it.
Building a church culture centered on followership
Peterson’s philosophy also raises an important question about the culture we establish within our churches.
What would happen if Christ-centered leaders prioritized faithful followership over recognition, status, and conventional measurements of success?
I believe this approach could transform how we understand discipleship, prayer, and servant-hearted leadership.
1. Discipleship would become more relational
Peterson explains that Jesus used stories to invite people into relationships and personal encounters.
Rather than organizing his ministry around buildings, crowds, or prominent individuals, Jesus invested in people and invited them to participate in the life of God’s kingdom.
This challenges churches to examine how they measure their effectiveness.
Attendance, volunteer participation, and numerical growth can provide valuable information. However, these measurements do not tell the complete story of what God is doing in people’s lives.
A church may have impressive attendance while struggling to develop meaningful relationships and mature disciples. Conversely, a smaller congregation may be making a significant spiritual impact through personal mentorship, service, and discipleship.
If we implement Peterson’s philosophy, I believe our churches can develop a deeper commitment to knowing people rather than merely counting them.
The goal is not simply to attract individuals into a building. It is to help people encounter Jesus and become faithful followers of him.
2. Prayer would shape our leadership culture
A second outcome would be a greater dependence on prayer.
Following Jesus requires more than developing strategies and implementing programs. It requires leaders who continually seek his direction.
This dependence should not remain confined to the church building or formal ministry activities. It should influence how we live, work, serve our communities, and interact with others wherever God has placed us.
A prayerful leadership culture would encourage us to examine our decisions, surrender our expectations, and remain attentive to God’s direction amid uncertain circumstances.
We can still establish goals and develop organizational plans. However, we must recognize that our plans are ultimately subject to God’s purposes.
Prayer reminds us that we are followers before we are leaders.
3. Servant-hearted leadership would replace the pursuit of status
A third outcome would be a leadership culture that emphasizes service rather than personal recognition.
When leaders understand the difference between ambition and energy, ministry opportunities become responsibilities to steward rather than positions through which to establish personal importance.
This could influence how churches develop leaders, empower volunteers, and distribute ministry responsibilities.
Instead of concentrating attention on prominent individuals, churches could cultivate environments where people are equipped to serve according to their gifts, abilities, and spiritual maturity.
Leadership development would involve more than teaching organizational skills. It would include helping people develop their character, examine their motives, and grow in their relationship with Jesus.
Ultimately, this approach would encourage the Body of Christ to pursue opportunities with a servant’s heart.
Following the Master wherever he leads
Peterson’s Follow the Leader series has challenged me to reconsider what it means to pursue leadership faithfully.
I still desire to grow as a minister, develop my abilities, pursue future opportunities, and serve in pastoral ministry. However, I increasingly recognize that none of these aspirations should become more important than following Jesus.
My calling is not validated by a position, and my faithfulness cannot be measured exclusively by visible accomplishments.
I want to remain faithful where God has placed me while continuing to prepare for wherever he may guide me.
This requires prayer, obedience, humility, and a willingness to examine my motives continually.
As Christian leaders, we must remember that our responsibility is not simply to become more influential. It is to allow Jesus to shape how we exercise whatever influence he has entrusted to us.
Before we ask how we can become better leaders, perhaps we should begin with a more important question:
How are we becoming better followers of Jesus?
This reflection is based on Eugene Peterson’s three-part Follow the Leader series, particularly his discussions of followership, relational leadership, prayer, success, and the distinction between ambition and energy.
For most of my life, I participated in liturgy before I really understood what liturgy was.
When I heard the word liturgy, my mind naturally leaned toward traditional forms of worship, the kind of structured worship I experienced growing up Catholic. Yet as I have studied worship more intentionally, I have begun recognizing something important: liturgy is not limited to churches with robes, candles, sacraments, or ancient traditions.
Every church has patterns.
Every congregation develops practices that shape how people approach God.
And sometimes, we participate in those patterns for years before realizing how deeply they are forming us.
Growing Up in a World of Reverence
My earliest experiences with Christian worship came through Catholicism.
The worship environment emphasized reverence and order. Scripture was read. Prayers were offered. Music accompanied the congregation. The Eucharist occupied an important place in worship. Symbols, movements, candles, holy water, and other practices communicated that worship was something sacred.
There was an order to what happened.
Even the physical movements within the service communicated something. The priest’s movement toward the altar, the participation of those assisting him, congregational responses, and the celebration of the Eucharist all contributed to the experience of worship.
As a child, I wasn’t analyzing these things theologically.
I was simply experiencing them.
Looking back, however, I can see that these practices were teaching me something about reverence, community, sacredness, and the importance of approaching God intentionally.
Then my Christian journey entered a very different worship world.
Encountering Pentecostal Worship
During my high school years, I moved from my Catholic upbringing into Christianity within a Pentecostal environment, particularly the Assemblies of God.
The transition was significant.
Suddenly, I encountered people lifting their hands in worship. I saw people bowing at altars. I heard speaking in tongues. Music was contemporary and production-oriented. Worship seemed to allow significantly more freedom of expression than what I had experienced growing up.
At first, these differences were striking.
Yet something I now recognize is that Pentecostal worship still had an order.
There was worship. There was giving. There was preaching. There were opportunities to respond to the gospel. Communion was practiced. The service was structured, but within that structure there was room for freedom and personal response.
That realization has challenged one of the assumptions I previously carried about liturgy.
Structure and freedom do not necessarily have to oppose one another.
A worship service can have an intentional order while still creating room for people to respond personally to God.
When Music Becomes More Than Music
Music also became an important difference between these worship experiences.
I had experienced congregational music within Catholic worship, but Pentecostal worship introduced me to another dimension of how music could function within a service.
Music wasn’t simply something happening before the sermon.
The words being sung could help direct the congregation’s attention toward God. Worship leaders could help prepare people to reflect, respond, pray, and become more aware of God’s presence.
That has helped me think differently about the role of music in worship.
Music can participate in the spiritual formation of a congregation.
What we repeatedly sing about God can influence how we understand Him. What we sing about surrender, grace, holiness, salvation, and faith can eventually become part of the theological vocabulary through which we understand our relationship with God.
Worship music, therefore, is not merely preparation for something more important.
It is itself part of the worshiping life of the Church.
Where I Worship Today
Today, I worship and serve at Mission City Church, a contemporary non-denominational church whose worship environment has many similarities to my Pentecostal roots.
Our services normally include worship, prayer, giving, preaching, and altar ministry. We celebrate communion monthly. There are also occasions when people experiencing sickness or medical difficulties are prayed for through laying on of hands and anointing with oil.
What I particularly appreciate is the personal dimension of these practices.
There is something meaningful about praying for another person rather than merely acknowledging that prayer matters. There is something meaningful about creating moments where people can reflect on what God may be doing in their lives.
These practices connect worship with the mission of the church.
If our mission involves helping people encounter Jesus, then the way we worship should participate in that mission.
Prayer matters.
Preaching matters.
Music matters.
Communion matters.
The opportunity to respond matters.
They are not simply pieces of a Sunday schedule. Together, they help shape how a congregation encounters God and understands what it means to follow Him.
A Journey Between Two Worlds
Looking back, I can appreciate aspects of both worship worlds that have shaped me.
My Catholic upbringing exposed me to reverence, order, symbolism, Scripture, sacrament, prayer, and communal participation.
My Pentecostal formation introduced me to expressive worship, altar response, spiritual gifts, contemporary worship music, and an expectation that people could actively encounter God during congregational worship.
My present church experience continues to shape how I understand these things.
I no longer think the most important question is simply whether worship is traditional or contemporary.
A deeper question is:
What are our worship practices teaching people about God?
Every repeated practice communicates something.
The songs we sing communicate something.
The way we pray communicates something.
The way we preach communicates something.
The way we approach Communion communicates something.
Even the way we invite people to respond communicates something about what we believe God is doing among His people.
Learning the Language for What I Already Experienced
I am still learning about liturgy.
In fact, one of the most valuable realizations from studying worship has been recognizing how much I have experienced without necessarily having the theological vocabulary to explain it.
I knew what it was like to experience structured worship.
I knew what it was like to experience expressive worship.
I knew Eucharist and Communion.
I knew congregational singing.
I knew preaching.
I knew prayer.
I knew altar calls.
I knew what it was like to watch people seek an encounter with God.
What I didn’t always recognize was how all these practices fit together and shape the worshiping life of a congregation.
Perhaps that is one of the gifts of theological education.
Sometimes theological study introduces us to something completely new.
Other times, it finally gives us words for something God has allowed us to experience for years.
You may participate in liturgy long before you learn to call it liturgy.
When we hear the word liturgy, many of us immediately think about a formal church service. We might picture a particular order of worship, prayers, Scripture readings, Communion, or traditions practiced within certain denominations.
But what if liturgy is bigger than what happens during a Sunday service?
What if our lives are being shaped by liturgies every day?
While studying biblical worship, I have been challenged to think about worship not simply as something Christians attend but as a way of life formed through repeated rhythms. The things we continually give our time, attention, and energy to eventually shape what we value.
That realization raises an important question: What rhythms are shaping my worship?
More Than Attending Church
There was a season when I wanted to become more involved in my local church, but my schedule made that increasingly difficult. Between work, academics, ministry responsibilities, and everything else happening in life, there simply was not much margin.
During that season, I remember telling my pastor something that has continued to shape the way I think about church:
My goal is not simply to attend church. I want to participate in the life of the church.
There is a difference.
Church attendance certainly matters. Gathering with other believers is an important part of Christian discipleship. But the Christian life cannot be reduced to occupying a seat for a couple of hours each week.
The church is a community in which we worship together, serve together, pray together, grow together, encourage one another, and participate in God’s mission together.
That requires rhythm.
Our schedules reveal what repeatedly receives our attention. Work has a rhythm. School has a rhythm. Entertainment has a rhythm. Relationships have rhythms. Even our phones create rhythms through notifications, scrolling, and constant communication.
None of these things are automatically wrong. However, they can become competing liturgies when they consistently shape our lives more powerfully than our devotion to God and participation in Christian community.
I eventually had to examine what was preventing me from participating more fully in the life of the church and make adjustments. Those changes created greater space for spiritual growth, ministry involvement, and Christian community.
Sometimes spiritual growth requires examining not only what we believe, but also how we have structured our lives around what we believe.
Israel’s Worship Was Built Around Remembrance
This connection between worship and rhythm is not something invented by the modern church.
We see it throughout Scripture.
Leviticus 23 describes appointed times when Israel gathered to observe feasts and sacred occasions before the Lord. These celebrations created recurring rhythms within the life of God’s people.
Israel was repeatedly called to remember.
Remember God’s deliverance.
Remember God’s provision.
Remember God’s covenant.
Remember who they were because of what God had done.
Their calendar itself became a tool for spiritual formation.
God’s people were not simply learning theological information about Him. Their lives were structured around practices that continually brought God’s faithfulness back into view.
That principle remains valuable for Christians today.
Worship Looks Back So Faith Can Move Forward
Biblical remembrance is more than nostalgia.
We do not remember God’s faithfulness because we want to remain trapped in yesterday. We remember because yesterday’s faithfulness strengthens today’s trust.
There are moments when we need to look backward so that we have the faith to continue moving forward.
Think about what happens when someone shares a testimony.
A testimony declares:
This is where I was.
This is what God did.
This is where I am now.
That remembrance becomes worship because the focus ultimately moves from our circumstances to God’s faithfulness.
Baptism provides another powerful picture of remembrance and testimony. It publicly identifies the believer with the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ while declaring the reality of a transformed life.
Our personal practices can also create rhythms of remembrance.
Journaling prayers, for example, allows us to return months or even years later and recognize prayers God answered, situations God carried us through, and moments when His faithfulness became evident in ways we might otherwise have forgotten.
Sometimes we need written reminders that say, in effect:
God met me there.
And when another difficult season comes, those memories can strengthen our confidence that the same God remains faithful.
Churches Need Memory Too
Remembrance should not only happen individually.
Churches have stories.
Congregations experience seasons of growth, difficulty, transition, revival, loss, provision, and transformation. Remembering those moments can teach future generations about God’s faithfulness.
This is especially important in a culture constantly searching for what is new.
There is value in asking:
Where has God brought us from?
What prayers has He answered?
What difficult seasons did He carry this congregation through?
What can the next generation learn from those who came before them?
When those stories are preserved and shared, church history becomes more than information about the past. It becomes testimony.
One generation can tell another generation, “This is what we saw God do.”
And the next generation can respond with faith for what God may do again.
What Is Shaping Your Life?
Thinking about worship as liturgy ultimately forces us to examine our rhythms.
Everyone has them.
The question is not whether our lives contain liturgies. The question is which liturgies are forming us.
What consistently receives our time?
What repeatedly receives our attention?
What communities are shaping our identity?
What practices help us remember God’s faithfulness?
And perhaps one of the most important questions:
Are we merely attending church, or are we participating in the life of the church?
Worship extends far beyond the songs we sing on Sunday morning. It involves forming a life that repeatedly turns our attention toward God, remembers His faithfulness, participates in His people, and responds to what He has done.
We remember what God has done.
We worship Him in the present.
And because we remember His faithfulness, we move into the future with hope.
Worship has a way of revealing what is happening within the human heart.
When we think about sin, words such as shame, guilt, condemnation, and separation often come to mind. Scripture certainly takes sin seriously. Yet for the believer, awareness of sin should not simply drive us into shame. Instead, through Christ, conviction can become an invitation to repentance, restoration, and deeper worship.
This raises an important question for the church: Can we truly understand worship without confronting the reality of sin?
Worship Requires an Awareness of God’s Holiness
One of the most powerful biblical pictures of worship appears in Isaiah 6. Isaiah encounters the holiness and majesty of God and immediately becomes aware of his own condition:
“Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips.” — Isaiah 6:5
Isaiah’s response demonstrates something important about worship. The closer he becomes to the revelation of God’s holiness, the more aware he becomes of his own need for cleansing.
John Oswalt emphasizes this relationship between sin and worship by arguing that genuine worship requires an awareness of our uncleanness before a holy God. Worship is not merely celebration. It is also confrontation.
We encounter God as He is, and that encounter reveals areas of our lives that need to be surrendered to Him.
Yet Isaiah’s story does not end with his uncleanness.
God provides cleansing.
That distinction matters tremendously for the church. Conviction points us toward restoration, while condemnation leaves us believing there is no way forward.
Healthy Christian worship should therefore create room for both realities: the seriousness of sin and the transforming grace of God.
What Would a Culture of Surrender Look Like?
This challenges us to consider how our churches address sin within worship.
Do our worship gatherings provide opportunities for people to examine their hearts before God? Do we teach believers how to distinguish conviction from condemnation? Do we allow moments of reverence, repentance, prayer, and surrender alongside moments of celebration?
Sometimes surrender can even become physically expressed.
A believer may kneel.
Someone may bow at an altar.
Another person may quietly pray while members of the congregation surround them in prayer.
These actions are not what make repentance genuine. Nevertheless, physical expressions can communicate an inward reality: “Lord, I surrender myself to You.”
There is something beautiful about this within the gathered church. Repentance does not necessarily happen in isolation. A believer can encounter God personally while simultaneously being surrounded by a community that prays, encourages, and walks alongside them.
Worship therefore becomes both personal and communal.
Idolatry Is Still a Worship Problem
Sin is not the only issue that confronts our worship. Scripture repeatedly warns God’s people about idolatry.
When reading the accounts surrounding Jeremiah and Ezekiel, we encounter a people whose worship had become corrupted by competing allegiances. Idolatry was not merely an unfortunate spiritual habit. It represented misplaced worship.
Although our modern idols may look different, the underlying problem remains.
Timothy Keller famously described counterfeit gods as things that become so central to our identity and security that losing them can make life feel almost unbearable.
That definition should cause us to examine ourselves.
Our idols may not be statues.
They may be careers.
Relationships.
Money.
Recognition.
Education.
Influence.
Political causes.
Even our talents and opportunities can become dangerous when they begin providing the identity, security, or significance that ultimately belongs to God.
The question is therefore not merely, “What am I pursuing?”
A deeper question is:
“Why am I pursuing it?”
When Good Things Become Ultimate Things
This became particularly challenging for me because Ecclesiastes has also shaped my thinking about ambition and purpose.
Ecclesiastes repeatedly confronts humanity’s attempt to find ultimate meaning through earthly pursuits. Wealth, accomplishment, pleasure, wisdom, and labor cannot carry the weight of ultimate significance apart from God. They become a chasing after the wind.
That does not mean ambition, education, ministry, relationships, careers, or personal development are inherently wrong.
The issue is what place they occupy within our hearts.
I have increasingly found myself asking:
Do I trust my own gifting and abilities, or do I trust the God who gave them to me?
There is an important difference.
God can provide opportunities, abilities, relationships, and influence that genuinely glorify Him. Yet even gifts from God can become idols when the gift becomes more important than the Giver.
Christian surrender therefore involves more than abandoning obviously sinful behavior. Sometimes surrender means placing our greatest dreams before God and saying:
“Lord, even this belongs to You.”
Worship Reorders the Heart
Perhaps this is one of the greatest purposes of worship.
Worship reminds us who God is.
And when we understand who God is, we begin to understand everything else differently.
Our sins are confronted by His holiness.
Our shame encounters His grace.
Our idols are exposed by His worthiness.
Our ambitions become surrendered to His purposes.
Our gifts become instruments for His glory rather than monuments to ourselves.
True worship does not simply produce an emotional experience on Sunday morning. True worship continually reorders the heart around God.
That leaves me with several questions worth continuing to explore:
How can churches teach and model repentance without creating cultures of condemnation?
How can our worship gatherings cultivate reverence and surrender alongside joy and celebration?
How can Christians recognize when something good has quietly become an idol?
And perhaps the most personal question:
If God removed the things I depend upon for identity, significance, and security, would God Himself still be enough?
When we think about worship, we often think about celebration.
We think about singing praises, declaring God’s goodness, thanking Him for answered prayers, and celebrating what He has done. These are beautiful and necessary expressions of worship. Yet Scripture reveals another dimension of worship that can sometimes make Christians uncomfortable:
Lament.
Lament reminds us that God is not afraid of the condition of our hearts. He receives our praises, but He also receives our questions, disappointments, fears, and cries for help.
Biblical worship does not require us to pretend everything is okay before approaching God.
Lament Is More Than Complaining
There is an important difference between lamenting and simply complaining.
Complaining can become focused entirely on the problem. Biblical lament brings the problem into the presence of God.
In Biblical Worship: Theology for God’s Glory, Erika Moore distinguishes biblical lament from contemporary ideas of psychological complaint. That distinction matters because lament has a theological direction.
Lament says:
“God, this hurts, but I am bringing this pain to You.”
The purpose is not simply to describe everything that has gone wrong. Lament creates a bridge between our suffering and our trust in God.
Throughout biblical lament, we find movements such as addressing God, presenting our concerns, asking Him to intervene, remembering His character, expressing confidence in Him, and continuing to worship.
This means faith does not require emotional dishonesty.
Sometimes one of the greatest expressions of faith is being willing to tell God exactly where we are while continuing to believe He is listening.
What Happens When God Seems Silent?
Psalm 88 provides an especially challenging picture of lament.
Many biblical passages eventually move toward an obvious declaration of hope or praise. Psalm 88 is different. The psalmist cries out to God while experiencing darkness, loneliness, and what feels like divine absence.
There is no neat resolution.
There is no immediate testimony at the end explaining how everything worked out.
And perhaps that is exactly why Christians need Psalm 88.
We often want prayer to produce a clear answer.
Yes.
No.
Go.
Stop.
This is what I am doing.
But what happens when the answer seems to be silence?
Dickson Ngama observes that sometimes believers must wait patiently even while making impatient demands of God, and that waiting itself requires faith.
That changes how we understand unanswered prayer.
Waiting is not necessarily evidence that God has abandoned us.
Waiting may become one of the places where faith is formed.
Faith in the Waiting
We live in a culture built around speed.
We can receive food quickly, communicate instantly, order products and have them delivered rapidly, and access enormous amounts of information within seconds.
Then we pray.
And sometimes God says:
Wait.
Waiting can expose things within us that immediate answers never would.
It confronts our fears.
It exposes our desire for control.
It challenges our expectations.
It forces us to ask whether our confidence rests in receiving the outcome we want or in the character of the God to whom we prayed.
There are situations in my own life where I would love for God to provide an immediate answer. Yet discipleship means learning that God’s timing does not operate according to my preferred schedule.
Sometimes faith means moving.
Sometimes faith means stopping.
And sometimes faith means remaining exactly where God has placed us until greater clarity comes.
Making a quick decision simply because waiting feels uncomfortable can easily become an attempt to manufacture our own answer.
Biblical lament teaches another possibility:
We can remain before God even when the answer has not arrived.
When Prayer Becomes Gossip
Lament also has implications for how churches respond to the suffering of others.
Church communities can become messy because churches consist of imperfect people being transformed by the grace of God.
Unfortunately, there are moments when Christians can disguise gossip as spiritual concern.
We have probably heard some variation of:
“I’m not gossiping. I’m telling you so we can pray for them.”
Yet simply attaching prayer language to someone’s personal situation does not automatically make the conversation healthy.
Biblical lament should draw us toward compassionate presence rather than curiosity about another person’s problems.
Instead of asking, “What happened to them?”
Perhaps the church should become better at asking:
“How can we stand with them?”
There are times when suffering people do not need another theological explanation.
They need someone willing to sit beside them.
Pray with them.
Cry with them.
Listen to them.
Carry burdens with them.
And continue believing with them when they are struggling to believe for themselves.
Can the Church Become a House of Lament?
This raises an important question for contemporary worship:
Does our worship make room for people who are suffering?
Churches should absolutely celebrate God’s goodness.
We should sing about His victory.
We should testify about answered prayer.
We should celebrate healing, restoration, salvation, deliverance, and transformation.
But what about the person whose prayer has not yet been answered?
What about the family experiencing grief?
What about the believer asking God for direction and hearing nothing?
What about someone faithfully praying for healing while continuing to suffer?
If our worship only gives language to victory, suffering Christians may begin wondering whether something is wrong with their faith.
Scripture gives them another vocabulary.
Lament.
Perhaps our churches need intentional moments where believers can acknowledge suffering together.
That could happen through congregational prayer, Scripture readings, pastoral prayer, testimony, small groups, prayer gatherings, or even carefully selected songs that acknowledge suffering while directing people toward God.
A church can be both a house of praise and a house of lament.
Those realities do not contradict one another.
They belong together.
Worshiping Before the Answer Comes
One of the deepest lessons of lament is that worship does not have to wait until the testimony is finished.
We can worship while waiting.
We can pray while confused.
We can trust while hurting.
We can remain faithful while still asking questions.
And sometimes our greatest declaration of faith is not:
“God answered exactly how I expected.”
Sometimes it is:
“I still trust God even though I do not understand what He is doing.”
Psalm 88 reminds us that Scripture has room for prayers that end without resolution.
That means the church should have room for people whose stories are still unfinished.
Perhaps mature worship is not only praising God after the breakthrough.
Perhaps mature worship is learning to remain in His presence before the answer comes.
Inspired by reflections from Biblical Worship: Theology for God’s Glory by Benjamin K. Forrest, Walter C. Kaiser Jr., Vernon M. Whaley, David M. Wheeler, John W. Cartwright, and C. Randall Bradley (Kregel Academic, 2021).
There is a significant difference between wanting God and wanting God to fix our circumstances.
While reading Biblical Worship: Theology for God’s Glory, I was challenged by the discussion of Israel’s pattern of crying out to God during times of distress. Israel repeatedly experienced the consequences of pursuing other gods, only to turn toward the Lord when those pursuits failed.
This raises an uncomfortable question for believers today:
Do we seek God because we desire Him, or because we desire what He can do for us?
A Conversion of Convenience
Benjamin K. Forrest describes one of Israel’s responses as a “conversion of convenience.” Israel acknowledged its sin and removed its idols, but the larger biblical pattern demonstrates how easily people can turn toward God because circumstances have become unbearable rather than because their hearts genuinely desire Him.
We can encounter the same temptation today.
Sometimes God becomes our last resort rather than our first pursuit.
Prayer becomes urgent when the diagnosis comes. We seek God when the relationship begins falling apart. We suddenly become interested in His direction when our own plans stop working. We ask for deliverance when consequences finally reach us.
There is nothing wrong with crying out to God during suffering. Scripture repeatedly invites us to do exactly that. The deeper question concerns the posture of our hearts.
Are we seeking deliverance from our circumstances, or are we surrendering ourselves to God?
Authentic repentance is more than wanting circumstances to change. It involves allowing God to change us.
Prayer Is an Act of Worship
This challenged me to reconsider prayer as more than simply presenting requests before God.
Prayer is worship.
If worship involves recognizing who God is and responding appropriately to Him, then our prayer lives reveal something about our understanding of God.
When God becomes someone we primarily approach during emergencies, our relationship with Him can slowly become transactional:
God, I have a problem. Please solve it.
But a life of worship develops another posture:
God, whether I am experiencing peace or difficulty, I belong to You. Lead me.
Developing a consistent life of prayer prepares us for the storms that eventually come. Instead of discovering God only when everything collapses, we learn to walk with Him before, during, and after the storm.
Crisis does not create our relationship with God; it reveals the relationship we have been cultivating.
Rediscovering Confession
Another aspect of worship that deserves greater attention is confession.
I was raised Catholic, so confession was familiar to me from an early age. My understanding of confession has changed significantly since then, but studying worship has caused me to reconsider something important: perhaps Christians from nonliturgical traditions can learn from traditions that intentionally create space for confession.
In many evangelical and Pentecostal settings, we commonly emphasize confessing our sins directly to God—and rightly so.
But Scripture also gives confession a communal dimension.
James 5:16 instructs believers to “confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed.”
That challenges an exclusively individualistic understanding of repentance.
There are sins that need to be brought before God privately. Yet there are also moments when healing requires trusted Christian community, pastoral care, accountability, prayer, and confession to another believer.
Sin thrives in secrecy.
Healthy Christian community brings what has been hidden into the light.
What Could Confession Look Like in the Church?
This does not necessarily mean standing before an entire congregation and publicly describing every sin we have committed.
Healthy confession requires wisdom, appropriate relationships, pastoral safeguards, and discernment.
But what would happen if our churches became places where Christians were less afraid to admit that they were struggling?
What if small groups became places where people could say, “I need prayer because I am struggling with this,” without immediately fearing rejection?
What if mature believers intentionally mentored younger believers through repentance and restoration?
What if pastors and ministry leaders modeled a Christianity in which spiritual maturity did not mean pretending to have no struggles?
Perhaps confession should become more visible within our understanding of discipleship.
The church should not become a place where sin is celebrated or minimized. Neither should it become a place where people become so afraid of judgment that they learn to hide their sin successfully.
The goal is restoration.
From Convenient Christianity to Genuine Discipleship
This brings me back to Israel.
A “conversion of convenience” seeks God when God becomes useful.
Discipleship seeks God because He is Lord.
That distinction forces me to examine my own spiritual life. I do not want prayer to become something I suddenly rediscover when circumstances become difficult. I want prayer, repentance, and confession to become ordinary rhythms of worship.
And perhaps our churches need the same examination.
Are we creating disciples who know how to ask God for help, or disciples who know how to surrender their lives to Him?
Are we creating communities where Christians hide their struggles, or communities where repentance leads toward healing and restoration?
Most importantly:
Do we want God’s intervention, or do we want God Himself?
True worship cannot merely be a conversion of convenience.
It is a life continually surrendered to the One who is worthy of our worship—in seasons of blessing, seasons of suffering, and everything in between.
Scripture for Reflection
James 5:16 — “Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed.”
Further Reading
Forrest, Benjamin K., Walter C. Kaiser Jr., Vernon M. Whaley, David M. Wheeler, John W. Cartwright, and C. Randall Bradley. Biblical Worship: Theology for God’s Glory. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Academic, 2021.
Leadership can sometimes feel like navigating without a clear sense of direction.
We may know where we believe God has called us, but circumstances change. Opportunities disappear. Expectations do not become reality. Life introduces responsibilities we did not anticipate, and suddenly the path toward our calling looks different from the one we originally imagined.
The question then becomes: How do we remain faithful when the direction of our lives requires recalibration?
As I reflected on the leadership of the Judean kings, two ideas stood out to me: our dependence on the Holy Spirit and our willingness to recalibrate when necessary. Together, they have challenged me to think about leadership not simply as what I accomplish, but as what God is doing within me.
Leading From the Inside Out
Hezekiah’s leadership provides an interesting picture of restoration.
His reign involved repairing what had been neglected and restoring what had been lost. One fascinating part of his leadership was the development of Jerusalem’s water system. Water needed to be brought into the city and protected from outside threats.
That physical reality caused me to think about something spiritual.
What sustains us must come from the inside out.
For Christian leaders, our greatest resource cannot simply be our education, experience, personality, talents, or expertise. Those things can certainly be valuable, but they cannot become substitutes for dependence upon God.
As a Pentecostal Christian, this makes me think particularly about dependence upon the Holy Spirit.
Spirit-empowered leadership is not limited to what happens behind a pulpit, during worship, or at an altar. Dependence upon the Spirit should influence our lifestyle, decisions, relationships, priorities, and direction.
It requires continually seeking God and allowing Him to work within us.
The more experience we gain, however, the easier it can become to trust ourselves.
We begin recognizing patterns. We know how to solve certain problems. Education gives us frameworks. Experience gives us confidence. Leadership gives us instincts.
None of those things are inherently wrong.
The danger comes when competence begins replacing dependence.
I want my lifestyle, decision-making, seeking of God, and continued infilling of the Spirit to keep my own strength and expertise from becoming the foundation of everything I do.
Because leadership that begins internally with God will eventually become visible externally through the leader.
When Leadership Loses Its Orientation
The leaders who followed Josiah provide another sobering picture.
A kingdom that had experienced reform eventually entered instability. Leadership deteriorated, circumstances changed rapidly, and Judah moved toward destruction and exile.
Their stories made me think about recalibration.
There is a phenomenon pilots can experience called spatial disorientation. Under certain conditions, their senses can give them an inaccurate perception of the aircraft’s position and movement. What feels correct may not actually correspond with reality.
Life can sometimes feel similar.
We develop expectations about where we should be, what our calling should look like, or how quickly certain things should happen. Then circumstances change.
Suddenly, what we expected and what we are experiencing no longer match.
That is where recalibration becomes necessary.
When Calling Doesn’t Look Like You Expected
I’ve experienced this personally.
At 25, circumstances caused me to question aspects of my calling because my life did not look like what I believed ministry was supposed to look like.
There can be an unspoken assumption in ministry that fulfilling your calling means eventually obtaining a particular position.
Become the pastor.
Get the ministry opportunity.
Receive the title.
Step onto the platform.
When those opportunities don’t materialize according to our expected timeline, it can become easy to wonder whether we misunderstood God.
But as I’ve grown, my understanding of calling has expanded.
Now, at 30, I’m increasingly recognizing that ministry does not begin when someone gives me a ministry position.
Calling can be lived wherever God has presently entrusted influence to me.
That includes the church, but it can also include the workplace.
It includes conversations.
It includes relationships.
It includes how we serve people who may never enter our churches.
Sometimes being missional means recognizing that our current environment isn’t merely something we’re enduring until the “real ministry” arrives.
It may actually be part of the mission field God has entrusted to us right now.
Recalibration Is Not Abandonment
This has changed how I think about redirection.
Recalibrating does not necessarily mean abandoning what God originally placed within us.
Sometimes recalibration is precisely how God brings us back into alignment with the calling.
There is a difference between abandoning a destination and adjusting how we navigate toward it.
That distinction matters because calling can easily become intertwined with personal ambition. We can begin with sincere obedience to God and gradually develop such a specific picture of what obedience is supposed to look like that we struggle when God doesn’t follow our blueprint.
Dependence upon the Holy Spirit challenges that mentality.
If the Spirit is genuinely leading my life, then I must remain willing for God to adjust my expectations, methods, timing, and even opportunities.
The calling belongs to Him before it belongs to me.
Approaching the Next Transition
This becomes especially meaningful as I approach another transition in my life.
Finishing my master’s degree naturally raises questions about what comes next.
Where should I serve?
What opportunities should I pursue?
What should the next stage of ministry and education look like?
Those are important questions, but I am realizing there is an even more important one:
What does God want?
There are things I desire for my future. There are ministry opportunities I would welcome. There are educational and vocational goals I continue to pursue.
But I don’t want desire alone determining direction.
I want prayer to precede movement.
I want dependence upon the Holy Spirit to precede strategy.
And I want enough humility to recalibrate when God’s direction differs from my expectations.
Leadership Begins Within
This connects with something I continue learning about leadership.
We often measure leadership externally: influence, effectiveness, accomplishments, positions, organizations, or the number of people following us.
Scripture continually brings us back inward.
What are we trusting?
Who are we becoming?
What is driving our decisions?
Are we still listening?
Are we still dependent upon God?
Are we willing to change direction when necessary?
Hezekiah’s story reminds me that restoration begins internally before its effects become visible externally. The instability that followed Josiah reminds me how quickly leadership can lose its orientation when its foundation disappears.
Both lead me toward the same conclusion:
Healthy Christian leadership requires both dependence and recalibration.
Dependence keeps God as the source of our strength.
Recalibration keeps us responsive when He adjusts our direction.
Perhaps faithfulness is not always about walking the exact path we imagined when God first called us.
Sometimes faithfulness means trusting Him enough to let Him redraw the route.
And as I continue navigating ministry, education, work, relationships, and whatever comes next, that is the kind of leader I want to become:
Spirit-dependent enough to follow and humble enough to recalibrate.
Starting well is important, but finishing well reveals much about the leader we have become.
This was one of the strongest convictions I walked away with while studying the leadership of the Judean kings. Throughout their stories, a troubling pattern emerges: leaders can begin faithfully, experience success, and even leave a positive legacy, yet gradually lose their dependence on God.
Their stories caused me to think beyond leadership as a position. Leadership includes how we respond to correction, whose voices we allow to influence us, whether we know when to rest, and how intentionally we prepare those coming after us.
Starting Well Is Not Enough
One lesson I learned years ago through preaching and teaching is that introductions and conclusions deserve intentional attention. It is possible to capture people’s attention at the beginning of a message but fail to bring everything together at the end.
Leadership can work the same way.
King Asa began his reign with trust in God, but that trust deteriorated toward the end of his leadership. Fear influenced his decisions, he rejected prophetic correction, and the conclusion of his reign looked considerably different from its beginning.
That challenged me to consider something personally: How do I respond when someone corrects me?
I recently experienced correction from pastoral leadership concerning gestures and behaviors that needed greater explanation. Although the correction was delivered more forcefully than I would have preferred, I recognized that I still had a responsibility to listen. The issue was primarily methodological rather than a rejection of my character or calling.
Leadership requires enough humility to recognize that even small matters deserve consideration.
Perception can turn something seemingly insignificant into something much larger when understanding, accountability, and vulnerability are absent. Sometimes maturity means being willing to listen even when we disagree with someone’s delivery.
The danger is not simply receiving incorrect advice. Sometimes the greater danger is becoming too arrogant to believe we need advice at all.
Who Has Permission to Influence You?
That question became even clearer through my interaction with classmates.
One discussion centered on Rehoboam, whose leadership demonstrates the consequences of listening to the wrong voices. He rejected the wisdom of experienced counselors and instead followed advice that ultimately contributed to the division of the kingdom.
Yet the solution cannot simply be, “Listen to people.”
Leaders must develop discernment.
Seeking counsel is valuable, but Christian leadership requires bringing that counsel before the Lord. Not every voice deserves equal influence, regardless of how confident, familiar, or persuasive that voice may be.
This creates an important tension:
We must remain teachable without becoming directionless.
We need people who can challenge us, correct us, encourage us, and expose our blind spots. At the same time, our ultimate dependence cannot rest upon human voices. Faithfulness to God helps us navigate the noise surrounding leadership.
The stories of Rehoboam and Joash demonstrate this from different directions. Rehoboam rejected wise counsel. Joash flourished under the mentorship of Jehoiada but later departed from faithfulness after that influence was gone.
Together, their lives remind me that mentorship matters, but mentorship must also produce leaders capable of walking faithfully when the mentor is no longer present.
Mentorship Should Build Bridges Between Generations
Another discussion challenged me to think about leadership succession.
Eventually, every leader’s season ends. Someone else will carry the responsibility forward. Therefore, leadership cannot merely concern what I accomplish during my lifetime. I must also consider whom I am preparing to lead after me.
As someone passionate about discipleship, I believe this requires building intentional bridges between generations.
But I also believe mentorship can work in both directions.
Older and more experienced generations possess wisdom that younger leaders desperately need. They have practical experiences, theological journeys, successes, failures, and lessons that cannot simply be downloaded from the internet or learned from a textbook.
At the same time, younger generations possess knowledge and tools that can strengthen those who came before them.
Technology provides a simple example. Churches increasingly use digital systems for registration, communication, social media, events, and ministry administration. Someone who grew up using these tools may navigate them almost instinctively, while another faithful and experienced leader may struggle with them.
Neither generation needs to dismiss the other.
The younger generation can provide new tools while the older generation provides tested wisdom.
Healthy leadership culture creates room for both.
Mentorship, therefore, should not simply be understood as information traveling from old to young. It should become a bridge where wisdom travels forward and innovation travels backward.
Strong Leaders Also Know When to Stop
Leadership development, however, cannot only concern productivity.
King Amaziah’s story challenged me in another area: rest.
His life demonstrates what can happen when dependence upon God’s strength gives way to dependence upon our own. That principle forced me to evaluate the rhythm of my own life.
There are seasons when life simply does not slow down. Responsibilities continue. Work continues. Ministry continues. Relationships require attention. Education requires discipline.
I understand that tension personally. Between working two jobs, serving in ministry, preparing for marriage, and finishing my master’s degree, rest can easily feel like something that interrupts productivity rather than something necessary for healthy leadership.
I have had to rethink that assumption.
I am naturally productive, so even something as simple as taking a nap once made me feel guilty. It felt like wasted time. Over time, however, I have learned that small periods of rest help relieve pressure and allow me to return to my responsibilities with greater clarity.
I am also learning the importance of withdrawing weekly. Adjustments in my work schedule have created more flexibility and given me weekends back, creating an opportunity to establish a more intentional rhythm of rest.
Rest is not the abandonment of responsibility.
It is the recognition that I am not sustained solely by my own strength.
Leadership Begins With Leading Yourself
Perhaps this is where all these lessons intersect.
Leadership is not confined to what happens behind a pulpit, inside an organization, or underneath a title.
Leadership involves how I receive correction.
It involves whose voices I permit to shape me.
It involves whether I can distinguish wise counsel from distracting noise.
It involves whether I am developing people who can eventually lead without me.
And it involves whether I can stop working long enough to remember that God’s kingdom does not depend entirely upon my productivity.
The Judean kings repeatedly demonstrate that yesterday’s faithfulness does not guarantee tomorrow’s faithfulness. Leaders must continually cultivate dependence upon God.
That changes the question from simply, “How do I become successful?”
A better question becomes:
“Who am I becoming while I lead?”
I want to become a leader who listens without surrendering discernment, receives correction without allowing pride to dominate, rests without guilt, learns from those ahead of me, contributes to those who have gone before me, and intentionally prepares those who will come after me.
Starting well matters.
But ultimately, I want to lead in such a way that when the conclusion is written, faithfulness is still part of the story.
