Categories
Educational Journey Uncategorized

A Journey Between Two Worship Worlds: What Catholicism and Pentecostalism Taught Me About Liturgy

For most of my life, I participated in liturgy before I really understood what liturgy was.

When I heard the word liturgy, my mind naturally leaned toward traditional forms of worship, the kind of structured worship I experienced growing up Catholic. Yet as I have studied worship more intentionally, I have begun recognizing something important: liturgy is not limited to churches with robes, candles, sacraments, or ancient traditions.

Every church has patterns.

Every congregation develops practices that shape how people approach God.

And sometimes, we participate in those patterns for years before realizing how deeply they are forming us.

Growing Up in a World of Reverence

My earliest experiences with Christian worship came through Catholicism.

The worship environment emphasized reverence and order. Scripture was read. Prayers were offered. Music accompanied the congregation. The Eucharist occupied an important place in worship. Symbols, movements, candles, holy water, and other practices communicated that worship was something sacred.

There was an order to what happened.

Even the physical movements within the service communicated something. The priest’s movement toward the altar, the participation of those assisting him, congregational responses, and the celebration of the Eucharist all contributed to the experience of worship.

As a child, I wasn’t analyzing these things theologically.

I was simply experiencing them.

Looking back, however, I can see that these practices were teaching me something about reverence, community, sacredness, and the importance of approaching God intentionally.

Then my Christian journey entered a very different worship world.

Encountering Pentecostal Worship

During my high school years, I moved from my Catholic upbringing into Christianity within a Pentecostal environment, particularly the Assemblies of God.

The transition was significant.

Suddenly, I encountered people lifting their hands in worship. I saw people bowing at altars. I heard speaking in tongues. Music was contemporary and production-oriented. Worship seemed to allow significantly more freedom of expression than what I had experienced growing up.

At first, these differences were striking.

Yet something I now recognize is that Pentecostal worship still had an order.

There was worship. There was giving. There was preaching. There were opportunities to respond to the gospel. Communion was practiced. The service was structured, but within that structure there was room for freedom and personal response.

That realization has challenged one of the assumptions I previously carried about liturgy.

Structure and freedom do not necessarily have to oppose one another.

A worship service can have an intentional order while still creating room for people to respond personally to God.

When Music Becomes More Than Music

Music also became an important difference between these worship experiences.

I had experienced congregational music within Catholic worship, but Pentecostal worship introduced me to another dimension of how music could function within a service.

Music wasn’t simply something happening before the sermon.

The words being sung could help direct the congregation’s attention toward God. Worship leaders could help prepare people to reflect, respond, pray, and become more aware of God’s presence.

That has helped me think differently about the role of music in worship.

Music can participate in the spiritual formation of a congregation.

What we repeatedly sing about God can influence how we understand Him. What we sing about surrender, grace, holiness, salvation, and faith can eventually become part of the theological vocabulary through which we understand our relationship with God.

Worship music, therefore, is not merely preparation for something more important.

It is itself part of the worshiping life of the Church.

Where I Worship Today

Today, I worship and serve at Mission City Church, a contemporary non-denominational church whose worship environment has many similarities to my Pentecostal roots.

Our services normally include worship, prayer, giving, preaching, and altar ministry. We celebrate communion monthly. There are also occasions when people experiencing sickness or medical difficulties are prayed for through laying on of hands and anointing with oil.

What I particularly appreciate is the personal dimension of these practices.

There is something meaningful about praying for another person rather than merely acknowledging that prayer matters. There is something meaningful about creating moments where people can reflect on what God may be doing in their lives.

These practices connect worship with the mission of the church.

If our mission involves helping people encounter Jesus, then the way we worship should participate in that mission.

Prayer matters.

Preaching matters.

Music matters.

Communion matters.

The opportunity to respond matters.

They are not simply pieces of a Sunday schedule. Together, they help shape how a congregation encounters God and understands what it means to follow Him.

A Journey Between Two Worlds

Looking back, I can appreciate aspects of both worship worlds that have shaped me.

My Catholic upbringing exposed me to reverence, order, symbolism, Scripture, sacrament, prayer, and communal participation.

My Pentecostal formation introduced me to expressive worship, altar response, spiritual gifts, contemporary worship music, and an expectation that people could actively encounter God during congregational worship.

My present church experience continues to shape how I understand these things.

I no longer think the most important question is simply whether worship is traditional or contemporary.

A deeper question is:

What are our worship practices teaching people about God?

Every repeated practice communicates something.

The songs we sing communicate something.

The way we pray communicates something.

The way we preach communicates something.

The way we approach Communion communicates something.

Even the way we invite people to respond communicates something about what we believe God is doing among His people.

Learning the Language for What I Already Experienced

I am still learning about liturgy.

In fact, one of the most valuable realizations from studying worship has been recognizing how much I have experienced without necessarily having the theological vocabulary to explain it.

I knew what it was like to experience structured worship.

I knew what it was like to experience expressive worship.

I knew Eucharist and Communion.

I knew congregational singing.

I knew preaching.

I knew prayer.

I knew altar calls.

I knew what it was like to watch people seek an encounter with God.

What I didn’t always recognize was how all these practices fit together and shape the worshiping life of a congregation.

Perhaps that is one of the gifts of theological education.

Sometimes theological study introduces us to something completely new.

Other times, it finally gives us words for something God has allowed us to experience for years.

You may participate in liturgy long before you learn to call it liturgy.

Categories
Educational Journey Uncategorized

Leading Like Jesus: Five Leadership Lessons from the Gospel of Luke

When we read the Gospel of Luke, we primarily encounter Jesus as our Lord and Savior: the Son of God who came to seek and save the lost. Yet as we follow His ministry, we also discover something about the way Jesus led people.

Jesus had a mission. He developed disciples. He gave others responsibility. He confronted issues of character and commitment. And when the pressure surrounding His mission intensified, He remained dependent upon the Father.

Reading Luke through the lens of leadership challenged me to think beyond leadership as simply having a title or position. Jesus demonstrates a form of leadership centered on mission, development, empowerment, character, and spiritual dependence.

Here are five leadership principles that stood out to me.

1. Stay Faithful to the Mission When Rejection Comes

Luke 4:18–29

Early in His ministry, Jesus entered the synagogue in Nazareth and read from the prophet Isaiah. He announced that the Scripture was being fulfilled in their hearing.

Yet the response eventually became hostile.

The people questioned Jesus because they knew Him as Joseph’s son. As the encounter continued, their skepticism turned into anger and rejection.

Still, rejection did not redefine Jesus’ mission.

That presents an important challenge for leaders: How much does the approval of others determine whether we believe we are successful?

Leadership inevitably brings different opinions. Some people will understand the mission, while others may question it. There will even be moments when rejection makes us question ourselves.

Jesus reminds us that faithfulness cannot ultimately be built upon approval. Christian leaders must continually return to what God has called them to accomplish.

That doesn’t mean leaders should refuse correction or ignore wise counsel. Rather, it means opposition by itself does not determine whether the mission is worth pursuing.

Our foundation must remain deeper than applause.

2. Develop People Intentionally

Luke 6:12–19

One of the most interesting things about Jesus’ leadership is the size of the group He chose to develop closely.

Jesus ministered to crowds, but He invested deeply in a smaller group of disciples. Before selecting the Twelve, Luke tells us that Jesus spent the night in prayer.

Jesus was intentional about who He would develop.

This challenged my thinking about mentorship. Leaders sometimes feel responsible for personally developing everyone around them. Depending on the size of the organization, that can quickly become unrealistic.

Jesus demonstrates another approach: invest deeply in people who can eventually influence others.

I see this principle even while working with students. When managing a group of more than fifteen students, every student brings different personalities, perspectives, attitudes, and needs. Trying to personally lead every student at exactly the same depth can become overwhelming.

But what happens when a leader begins developing a smaller group of student leaders?

Those students can begin influencing the culture around them.

Leadership development then becomes multiplication.

3. Give People Responsibility and the Authority to Carry It Out

Luke 9:1–10

Jesus didn’t keep His disciples beside Him forever.

Eventually, He sent them.

Luke records that Jesus gathered the Twelve, gave them power and authority, provided instructions, and sent them out to proclaim the kingdom of God and heal the sick. Later, they returned and reported what they had done.

Notice the progression:

Jesus called them.

Jesus developed them.

Jesus empowered them.

Jesus sent them.

Jesus received their report.

Jesus understood something every leader eventually has to learn: the mission becomes limited when everything depends upon one person.

Healthy leadership requires delegation, but biblical delegation involves more than handing someone a task.

People need preparation.

They need responsibility.

They need appropriate authority.

They need opportunities to practice.

And they need feedback afterward.

Churches sometimes become so focused on filling volunteer positions that we forget the importance of developing the person filling the position.

Imagine someone responsible for displaying lyrics during worship. It may seem like a simple responsibility, but that person needs to understand the software, lyrics, timing, pace, and transitions. Without preparation, mistakes can distract the congregation from participating in worship.

Giving someone a position is not the same as developing them for the position.

Jesus didn’t simply need workers. He developed disciples who could participate in His mission.

4. Character Matters More Than Charisma

Luke 18:18–23

When a ruler approached Jesus asking about eternal life, Jesus eventually confronted something deeper than outward obedience.

“You still lack one thing.”

Jesus identified something that challenged the man’s commitment. His wealth had become a barrier he was unwilling to surrender.

The encounter reminds us that leadership development sometimes requires uncomfortable conversations.

Someone can be passionate and still need development.

Someone can be gifted and still need accountability.

Someone can desire influence without being prepared for the sacrifice accompanying it.

This is especially important in ministry.

It can be easy to desire opportunities to preach, stand on a platform, lead worship, hold a title, or receive recognition. But what happens when discipleship involves correction? What happens when leadership requires serving somewhere nobody notices? What happens when someone identifies an area of our character that needs to change?

Charisma can attract attention, but character sustains leadership.

Healthy leadership cultures therefore cannot merely identify people’s gifts. They must also create environments where people can be discipled, corrected, challenged, and developed.

5. Leadership Requires Dependence Upon God

Luke 22:39–46

Eventually, Luke brings us to one of the most vulnerable moments of Jesus’ ministry: Gethsemane.

Jesus knew what was approaching.

He experienced tremendous anguish. Yet rather than pretending the situation was easy, Jesus prayed.

His prayer included the words:

“Yet not my will, but yours be done.”

There is something deeply important here for Christian leadership.

Jesus does not model leadership as emotional invulnerability. He does not pretend pressure doesn’t exist. Instead, He brings His anguish before the Father and remains obedient to God’s purposes.

Leadership will bring moments of pressure.

There may be misunderstanding, disappointment, difficult decisions, rejection, or even betrayal. Those moments expose the limits of leadership techniques.

Sometimes we don’t need another strategy.

We need God’s strength.

Prayer therefore isn’t an accessory to Christian leadership. Dependence upon God must remain at its center.

A Pattern of Leadership in Luke

When I put these passages together, I noticed that they form something of a progression:

1.) Mission

2.) Development

3.) Empowerment

4.) Character

5.) Perseverance

Jesus knew the mission.

He selected people to develop.

He entrusted those people with responsibility and authority.

He confronted issues that could hinder genuine commitment.

And through suffering and pressure, He remained dependent upon the Father and faithful to His mission.

That gives us a powerful picture of leadership.

Leadership isn’t merely about starting something.

It’s about knowing the mission well enough to remain faithful when rejection comes.

It’s about developing people instead of doing everything ourselves.

It’s about trusting others with meaningful responsibility.

It’s about caring enough about people to confront character issues.

And ultimately, it’s about recognizing that we cannot fulfill God’s purposes through our own strength.

The Gospel of Luke reminds me that Jesus didn’t merely accomplish a mission.

He developed people who could participate in it.

Perhaps that is one of the greatest questions every Christian leader should ask:

Am I simply accomplishing the work in front of me, or am I developing people who can carry the mission forward?